82% of employees don't trust their manager to tell them the truth.
Read that again. Not "somewhat trust." Not "trust most of the time." Don't trust.
And it's getting worse. Manager trust has collapsed from 46% in 2022 to just 29% in 2024, according to People Insight's 2026 data. In two years, we've lost nearly half the trust that existed between employees and their managers.
Meanwhile, only 32% of employees feel safe putting ideas forward. Which means two-thirds of your workforce have learned—through direct experience—that speaking up is dangerous.
Here's where it gets brutal: new research from Happily.ai shows that managers account for 70% of team engagement variance. Not culture. Not perks. Not the mission statements on the wall. Management.
So if managers drive that 70%, and only 18% of employees trust them, you don't have an engagement problem. You have a trust crisis that's tanking everything else.
Most organisations hear that stat and immediately think: We need better managers. Time to invest in leadership development.
But here's the question no one's asking: How many of those managers trust their own leaders? Because if they don't—how exactly are they supposed to create trust with the people below them?
Trust is the foundation. Everything else—psychological safety, honest feedback, innovation, accountability, performance—stands on it.
You can run workshops on psychological safety, but if people don't trust their manager to tell them the truth, they won't speak up. You can implement feedback systems, but if people don't trust that feedback leads anywhere, they'll phone it in. You can talk about collaboration, but if people don't trust their colleagues or leaders, they'll protect their territory instead.
Trust is what allows us to:
Without trust, all of that stops. It might look like disengagement, but in reality it's survival mode.
And when trust collapses, the impact spreads in three directions: productivity craters, people change how they show up, and culture fractures.
First: Productivity craters—but not in ways leadership can see.
People still show up. Still hit meetings. Still deliver something. But they're operating at 60% capacity because 40% of their energy is spent protecting themselves instead of performing.
When you don't trust your manager to back you, you don't make calls—you escalate them. You don't share information—you withhold it. You don't flag problems early—you document everything so you're covered when it blows up.
The 2025 Retention Report found lack of management support hit a six-year high as a turnover driver. Leadership looks at the data and thinks everything's fine. Then people start quitting and we call it "quiet quitting." But the signs were there all along.
Second: The person changes.
You're in a 1:1. Your manager asks how the project's going. You know it's behind. You know the timeline was never realistic. You flagged it three weeks ago and were told "you'll make it work."
So what do you say?
If you trust your manager: "We're behind. Here's what I need."
If you don't: "It's fine. We're managing it."
Then you go back to your desk and work nights and weekends because honesty feels more dangerous than burnout.
Over time, people stop bringing ideas. They become hyper-vigilant—every email read three times, every meeting invite a calculation of threat. Amy Edmondson's research shows this becomes chronic stress that rewires how people show up: risk-averse, defensive, transactional.
They perform engagement while mentally planning their exit.
Third: Culture fractures—and it spreads fast.
Trust doesn't fail in isolation. One person stops sharing information. Their colleague notices and does the same. Someone hears what happened when someone spoke up and makes a note: Don't do that.
Slowly, the culture shifts.
Silos harden. Politics replace performance. Feedback becomes theatre—68% have learned it goes nowhere, so they fill in surveys because they have to, already knowing it's pointless.
Cynicism becomes the default. New initiative? "That'll last six months." Town hall about transparency? "Just managing the optics."
Edelman's 2024 Trust Barometer found 68% believe business leaders purposely mislead them—up from 56% in 2021. Once that belief is embedded, even genuine efforts to rebuild trust get read as manipulation.
Most organisations hear those numbers and reach for the training budget. We need better managers. Let's upskill them on transparency, on giving feedback, on building psychological safety.
And look—manager development isn't wrong. Many managers do need to be developed. But most businesses are solving the wrong problem.
Because here's what we're not asking: What percentage of managers trust their own leaders?
The data's grim: only 48% of employees trust senior leaders (Gartner, 2025)—down from 67% two years ago. And 68% of people think business leaders purposely mislead them (Edelman, 2024).
If roughly half of employees don't trust senior leadership, and managers are employees too—how many of your managers are trying to build trust with their teams while not trusting the people above them?
Here's the impossible position: Your manager gets called into a meeting. The company's restructuring. Three roles are being cut from their team. Decision's final. They're given corporate talking points about "organisational efficiency" and told to cascade by end of week. They walk out knowing the real reason is a budget cut to hit quarterly targets, the roles being cut are the ones leadership doesn't understand (not the ones that don't add value), and their team will ask questions they don't have answers to. If they push back, they'll be labelled "not a team player."
So they deliver the talking points—badly—while their team watches them squirm. And everyone learns that honesty isn't safe here.
You cannot create trust downstream when you don't have trust upstream. Training managers to build psychological safety won't work if the system above them punishes honesty. The problem isn't manager capability. It's that we're asking them to give what they don't have.
Let's be specific about what managers are dealing with:
They're told to "cascade" messages they don't understand or agree with. Then we wonder why employees don't trust them. But the manager doesn't trust the message either—they're just better at hiding it.
They're given accountability without authority. Responsible for engagement, retention, performance. Zero say in budgets, headcount, or strategic decisions that directly impact all three. How do you trust a system that sets you up to fail?
They're told to "be transparent"—then punished when they are. Share too much context? "You're not aligned with leadership." Admit you don't know something? "You're undermining confidence." Tell your team the real reason behind a decision? "That's not the approved messaging."
They watch colleagues get fired for the same honesty they're being told to practice. The manager who pushed back on an unrealistic timeline? Managed out. The one who told their team the truth about why a project got cancelled? Labelled "not leadership material." The one who advocated for their team during budget cuts? "Not strategic enough."
The managers who still have their teams' trust? Often they're the ones who've learned to quietly subvert the system. They "forget" to enforce policies they think are stupid. They translate corporate speak into plain English behind closed doors. They shield their team from unreasonable demands.
And that's exhausting. Unsustainable. And slowly corrodes the very thing that makes them good managers.
Trust doesn't cascade down from leadership through managers to teams like some kind of organisational waterfall.
Trust is built in every relationship, at every level.
But here's what does cascade: behaviour.
When senior leaders operate behind closed doors and speak in corporate euphemisms, managers learn that transparency is performative and honesty gets dressed up in language that hides truth. When leadership punishes people who challenge decisions, then blames managers when teams push back, managers learn they're cannon fodder, not leaders.
Managers copy what they see leadership doing, not what leadership says they should do.
So when we look at the trust collapse and think "we need better managers," we're missing the point.
The managers aren't the problem. The managers are the symptom.
They're stuck in the middle of a broken system, trying to create trust with their teams while leadership systematically destroys their ability to do so.
If you're serious about fixing this—and most organisations aren't—here's what it actually requires.
Not a training programme. Not a manager toolkit. A fundamental rethink of how trust gets built and broken in your organisation.
You cannot ask managers to be transparent with their teams if you're not transparent with managers.
That means sharing the real reasons behind decisions, not the sanitised version. Admitting when you don't know something instead of bullshitting. Explaining trade-offs honestly instead of pretending there's a perfect answer. Showing vulnerability when you get something wrong.
Because if senior leaders model opacity, managers will too. It's not a training gap. It's learned behaviour.
If you make a decision you know will be unpopular, own it. Don't make managers sell it as a good thing.
Give them the actual context—the constraints, the trade-offs, the reasons it's not ideal but necessary. And let them explain it in their own words, not corporate talking points.
And if a manager disagrees with the call? Let them say so. Because employees can handle "leadership made this decision and here's why" a lot better than "my manager is pretending this makes sense when we both know it doesn't."
Track whether employees trust their managers. Track whether managers trust senior leaders. Track whether senior leaders trust each other.
Not through a once-a-year survey that goes nowhere. Through regular, simple questions: Do you trust the people you report to? Do you feel safe raising concerns? Do you believe what you're being told?
Make the data visible at every level. And hold people accountable for those scores the same way you hold them accountable for revenue.
Because right now, we measure delivery but not trust. And we get what we measure.
Right now, the manager who tells their team the truth about a bad decision gets labelled "not aligned." The one who admits they don't have all the answers gets seen as weak. The one who challenges a flawed strategy gets called "not ready."
Flip that.
Celebrate the managers who surface problems early. Promote the ones who have the courage to say "this doesn't make sense." Fire the ones who lie to their teams to make themselves look good.
And—this is critical—protect the managers who tell you uncomfortable truths. Because if you punish honesty upstream, you guarantee dishonesty downstream.
You can't hold someone accountable for trust and engagement if they have zero control over the things that build or destroy it.
If you want managers to own outcomes, give them real authority over budgets, priorities, and how work gets done.
And if you're not willing to do that? Stop blaming them when trust tanks. Because they're not leading—they're messengers with a title and no power.
Stop pretending managers aren't stuck in the middle.
They are. And the squeeze is real.
So either give them the context, authority, and protection they need to lead with integrity—or stop being surprised when they can't build trust with teams while navigating a system that destroys theirs.
You can't have it both ways.
Here’s what most organisations don’t get; fixing the trust collapse isn’t a manager development problem. It’s a leadership integrity problem.
You can send managers to every workshop on psychological safety, transparency, and trust-building. But if senior leaders keep operating behind closed doors, speaking in euphemisms, and punishing honesty then you’re teaching managers to perform trust while the system destroys it.
The managers who still have their teams’ trust aren't the ones who went to the best training. They’re the ones who’ve learned to quietly subvert a broken system. And that’s not sustainable.
So yes, invest in development, but at every single level! And if your leadership team isn’t participating then you’ll never recover the eroded trust.
Look at the system. Look at how senior leaders show up. Look at what gets rewarded and what gets punished. Look at the impossible position managers are in.
Because until senior leaders model the behaviour they're asking managers to create downstream, you're not rebuilding trust.
You're just asking people to pretend harder.
And the workforce has already figured that out.
If you enjoy both boat puns and great insight on all things People, Culture + Leadership, then sign up for our newsletter Unleashed Thinking. One email per month, no spam.
If you are located elsewhere, pop us a 📩 and we will see what we can do!
